1987-VIL-35-SC-DT

Equivalent Citation: [1987] 167 ITR 637 (SC)

Supreme Court of India

Date: 14.07.1987

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

Vs

DB TARAPURWALA SONS AND CO., GANNON DUNKERLE

BENCH

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay Versus Hoechst Dye And Chemicals

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the court was delivered by

RANGANATH MISRA J.-These are appeals by special leave and the impugned order in each of these appeals is of the Bombay High Court rejecting the application of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay, under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act of 1961. As in our opinion question of law does arise out of the appellate order of the Tribunal in each of the cases, the Tribunal should have allowed the application under section 256(1) of the Act and when that was refused and the High Court was moved, the High Court should have allowed the several applications under section 256(2) of the Act and directed the Tribunal to state a case and refer the appropriate question for the opinion of the High Court.

Since we are directing a statement to be called for and the question to be referred, we refrain from expressing any opinion which might prejudice either of the parties before the High Court. We allow the appeals, vacate the orders of the Tribunal as also of the High Court confined to the question of reference and direct the following question to be referred by the Tribunal to the High Court for its opinion:

" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the expenditure by way of secret commission was deductible under section 37(1) of the Act in computing the business income of the assessee ?

 

DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.